The
greatest blog post ever written was almost ready to be published when I
added one more link and lost the whole thing! Darn auto-save! I've
tried to rewrite it, but it's not as good. What follows is the 2nd attempt...
I
met Constance Winters about 18 months ago on a Thursday
morning ladies rides from Ride Studio Cafe. I was made aware of her very
popular blog a few months prior and had become a fan. Constance is
actually a pseudonym, and since she introduced herself with her real
name, I didn't make the connection right away. But as we were riding
along, I realized that I was in the presence of a celebrity, and
suddenly blurted out, "Are you Lovely Bicycle?" To which she shyly
replied, yes. We continued riding and chatting until we got back to RSC.
Finding we had some common interests, we decided to get together again
for more rides.
Constance initially cycled purely for
transportation. Her blog focused heavily on bikes and clothes and such
for the utilitarian cyclist. But she had also started to explore the
realm of cycling for fun and sport, and was starting to do more and
longer recreational rides.
We met a few times over the next
few months for rides, including this one. I was quite surprised when I
read that post, as I had recalled that she was smiling throughout the
ride. Maybe she was just gritting her teeth. Fortunately, despite that
less than stellar ride report, she continued to join me for more rides, including
some with dirt roads and challenging climbs. And we soon developed a warm
friendship.
Over the spring and summer, Constance
completed many longer and more challenging recreational rides, including an overnight ride, and a few dirt road events. She also volunteered to work on the
local 600km brevet, where she was seemingly inspired to consider riding
some of these long and rule-riddled rides that we call randonnees.
This
year, she planned to take part in the first ride of the New England
Randonneur's calendar, a 100km populaire. She seemed a bit concerned
about the overall distance, since she would have to add about half
again as much distance riding to and from the start. I felt confident
she could do it. In the meantime I was planning to my own Haystack
Permanent a few weeks prior to the NER ride, and invited folks to join
me. Constance and half a dozen folks did exactly that. She rode to and
from the start, and completed the entire ride within the time limit and
with a smile on her face - really. I checked for gritted teeth this
time. The next week, Ride Studio Cafe had a rando-seaon kickoff ride and
party, and Constance again did the ride, plus riding to and from the
start. And then a couple of weeks later knocked off the NER populaire.
I'm
not quite sure when she began to consider the 200km brevet. But since
she already had done multiple 100km rides plus bonus miles to and from,
it wouldn't be a big leap to do the 200km. However the route is based on one of my own routes and is scenic, which is another way of
saying it's very hilly. It would be a challenge, but I had every
confidence she would complete the ride. I sometimes joke that brevets
bring out the stubborn people - the people who just stick to it and get
it done. I knew she wouldn't give up.
Anyway a few days prior to
the brevet, she joined my Tuesday RSC ride, saying if it went well she'd
do the 200km brevet. As part of my cunning plan to get her addicted to
randonneuring, I stuck with her that day to ensure she had a good ride.
At the end of the ride, we bumped into our friend Emily O'Brien back at the
studio, and learned she would be away for the weekend so would miss the
brevet. I was sad as I'd been hoping to ride with Emily. Emily and I have done a
few rides together this spring and we are riding at a very similar pace
these days. Upon hearing Emily would be away, Constance said "Ride with
me." And while I knew she was kidding, I ashamed to say that I laughed
it off, due to our differences in speed.
On the way home, I
replayed a conversation I'd had recently with some female racers
regarding getting more women into the sport. My response had been, "Just
ride with them." Not every training ride has to be full-on. In fact,
not every race has to be full-on. If you want to grow the sport, take
the time to ride with the new gals and show them the ropes. A little nurturing goes a long way.
Well what a hypocrite I am.
I
got home and fired off an email to Constance. "Let's plan to ride the
200km together." She immediately responded that she was only kidding and
never expected me to ride with her on a timed event given our speed
differences. I responded that it was about a fun-time not a fast-time.
With 13.5 hours allowed, we would have no problem officially completing
the event. Everyone gets the same credit, regardless of finishing in 7
hours or 13.
The one caveat was that I was leaving the next
day to go to NC. I had sold my father's house had planned to go down to
sign papers. But my father also has some on-going health issues and I'd need to go to
a few doctor's appointments too. I wasn't sure if I'd actually be back
in time. As luck would have it, I caught a flight late Friday. I didn't
get a lot of sleep, but I did make it to the ride start.
I
bumped into a bunch of old friends and we chatted briefly. Then I
spotted Constance. She seemed more subdued than usual, but she was ready
to ride. We headed out in a small crowd, that soon thinned down to 4 as
we started up the first notable climb. I rode along chatting with
another rider. When we reached the top, I stopped to adjust some
clothing and wait for Constance, while the others pressed on. When she
reached the top, she told me to go on, that she really didn't expect to
ride with me. I told her she was stuck with me for the day.
While
I had every confidence that she could complete the ride, I know from my
own experience how nice it is to have company. The time and miles just
pass faster when you aren't so focused on the ride!
I also vowed
to myself not to get separated like that again. I have an advantage on
the climbs, not due to strength, but the gearing on my bike. I have a
compact double, with 50/34 chainrings and a massive cassette, ranging
from 12-36. This gives me a wide range of gears, including a low one
that's less than 1 to 1. I may not use that gear often, but it's good to
have when I need or want it. My philosophy, which I must credit to Fear
Rothar, is "Better Looking at it than For it." This applies to gears,
clothes, tools, etc. With my low-low gear, I can always just shift down
and spin along beside. It's not like when I'm riding fixed and have to
maintain momentum to get up the hills.
Constance has a low gear
of 34X29, not nearly as low as mine. And I know she prefers a high
cadence. We talked about how to get lower gears with her preferred
shifters, and hopefully she can get this worked out.
Down
to just the two of us, and on quieter roads, we did the next climb side
by side, rolling along at a good pace. Maybe she felt she was on fire,
but something reminded her that she had left a pair of bike shorts in the oven, and
she'd need to stop to phone home. I was laughing so hard when she made
the call, that I'm not sure if she gave basting instructions or just
said they were done and time to come out!
I came to read your previously failed post ... and ended up over on Lovely Bicycle.
ReplyDeleteConstance is the second newbie randonneuse that I've seen describe Populaires as being 50-150 kms. I can't imagine where that is coming from. Anyway, I left a congratulatory and "nice write-up" comment; I also noted the correct distance for Pops and Perm-Pops.
If needed, you had better vouch for me as being a reasonable person. (I don't know how to make a "scowling emoticon.")
...M
Oh, yeah: it seems you did a better newbie initiation than Jerry and I did.
DeleteWait a minute: Constance's newbie initiation was actually on your Haystack Pop --> you left the newbie alone just as JP and I did. At least we had Robert (who later told me he was recalling April-2010 when riding with Brad and Greg).
Anyway, nice post.
Hi M - Thanks for stopping by my blog. I re-paste my reply to you here:
DeleteThe Populaire distance was from a reputable ACP-affiliated source, which I forget at the moment and can't find via a quick online search. However, the Audax UK site seems to agree (here), unless I am misreading it.
See my response on your blog.
DeleteBTW, I used my actual name on your blog.
By the way Martin -
DeleteEveryone is different in this, but I don't really see being left alone s a bad thing. Sometimes it's better than pressuring a beginner to ride at a pace that makes them feel miserable or inadequate. Then again I have a high tolerance for being on my own and enjoy riding alone. I did Pamela's 2nd Permanent (Blue Moon) that way, and it was fabulous.
Martin,
DeleteYou are correct that I left Constance alone with her camera on the Haystack ride. But she did tell me up front that she would be stopping to use this antique device called a film camera and to leave her in peace to do so!
As far as populaire distances, I'm quite happy that RUSA allows flexibility in distances for *permanents*, as opposed to arbitrary round numbers. This allows me to create a route based on nice quiet roads and scenery, rather than trying to squeeze something in to fit a round number. I think the confusion here may me that the AUKs have some official populaires that have to meet those round number criteria, similar to ACP brevets.
It is the fact that this 200km is an ACP brevet that caused the organizer to cut short the full Paradise climb, as well as trading a quiet road for a busier, shorter option, trying to get as close to 200km as possible, since the time limit on an ACP 200km event is set at 13.5 hours regardless of actual length. For a RUSA (vs ACP) event, the times are based on actual distance. How's that for confusing. See why I call it a rule-riddled sport!
Hey, Pamela, you know I'm (mostly) just yanking your chain about leaving C/V alone, whether that chain be fixed or of a honey style. After all, I rode off the front of Brad and Greg (and Robert) on that "Beach" ride. :-/
DeleteI would have typed "engaging in banter," but the chain-thing came to mind half-way through typing that first sentence.
==========================
V/C, I understand about riding alone. In 2011, I did 10 solo Perms (each 200 to 208 kms, plus some cycling to and from the start/finish for most of those). Last year, I managed to do not a single solo Perm, as people did insist on riding with me, blah, blah. Anyway, this year, I've already managed to SNEAK in two solo Perms (210k in Jan, 201k last weekend); I typed SNEAK because I didn't let anyone (other than the route-owner of the 2nd ride) know I was going to do either ride. Solo can be quiet relaxing, esp. for the brain.
Also, as I explained to my buddy, Ricochet Robert, before his first credited RUSA ride (he did 2 brevets as a non-member before joining), I had learned on the first 400k I did that the bungee-cord that defines "riding with" on rando rides is a lot longer than the bungee-cord defining "with" on a club ride. On that first Ricochet perm ride, I was struggling and Ricochet was very upbeat bouncy; I finally pointed up the road, and Robert asked, "long bungee-cord?" I replied, "yep." Several miles later, I was again ready to be sociable as I had gotten through that purgatory moment.
One more thing, V/C, you can probably trust Pamela on almost all things cycling and rando, but maybe not on how to keep track of your control card. :-O
Enjoy the ride,
...Martin
Being semi-serious for a moment: your mentoring had I much better outcome than a lame effort I made last year: Fracquaintance Karen's July 'Egypt Mtn' report.
DeleteMy view of that ride.
On Labor Day Sunday, when temps were expected to be a bit cooler, Karen and I tried MikeD's "Black Creek" perm (a mostly flat, officially 204k route). It was shaping up as deja vu (all over again, as is sometimes redundantly said); then, Karen's ride ended quite suddenly.
After that September abandon, Karen decided that the 200k rides, and the R-12, was not for her. All her cycling friends and acquaintances have told her the same thing: "your saddle is too high and you are cramping because you are riding toe-down ALL the time. She once lowered her saddle some, but in less than 2 rides decided she didn't like it.
Oh, well ...
Pamela, I was both touched and embarrassed to read this. Embarrassed only because I do not like being the subject of posts. Everything you've written is accurate.
ReplyDeleteYou forgot to mention how afraid I was of you when we first started riding together! That seems hilarious in retrospect. I remember asking you "Will there be any hills? Will there be any hills? Is this THE HILL or not yet??" on every ride. Oh God.
Thanks for reminding me about that little club ride last spring! I must have blocked it out, because I forgot that I wrote a post about it. I cannot believe that I once found it so difficult. The 200K went a lot easier in comparison!
I think it is fair to say that in a sense you taught me how to ride a bike. I am not talking about this brevet, but the year and a half leading up to it. As you know, I have some balance/coordination problems and am extremely resistant to coaching, but you seem to know how to deal with me. Over time, I began to trust you and eventually would simply do whatever you told me. It's been working so far.
Thank you does not seem like enough, so I won't even say it.
See you soon.
V/C,
DeleteApologies for any embarrassment. And I haven't taught you to ride a bike. I may have tried to steer you in the direction of fun rides, dirt roads and hills. Just glad that you keep coming back.
Pamela,
ReplyDeleteThank you for this lovely post! I started with your website (pre-blog, I think) when I first became interested in brevet riding. I am a huge fan of yours and have been a huge fan of "V/C" ever since I stumbled upon her blog. I am an older rider who recently restarted cycling and completed my first 200K a year ago. It has taken me a full year to recover from that, and I will be attempting my second in a few days. As such, I am unbelievably impressed that "V/C" bicycled to the start of her first 200K! Thanks to you and "V/C" for all the wonderful reading over the years.
I love hearing that I have at least one long time reader :-) Here's hoping you recover from the 2nd 200km faster than the first!
DeleteCould you please explain further the GPS feature of profile preview?
ReplyDeleteThis is a feature on the Garmin Edge 800 (and possibly the 500). With a downloaded track, one can see the predicted route profile on the elevation page. There is a little circle that shows where you are! (This is not available on the 705, so I don't actually have it on my device. I have to ask Fear Rothar! It's the one thing that makes me consider getting a new device!)
DeleteThanks for the info which explains why I did'nt know about it as we are way behind and have a 605!
DeleteBeautiful post Pamela! It is fun to read about the same ride from the other side. I am truly envious of the many ride opportunities in your area, though, there may be similar opportunities here that I am simply unaware of. Anyway, thanks for the long-distance motivation.
ReplyDeletePaul,
DeleteI clicked on your profile. If the location is right, you are quite close to one of the most active randonneuring groups around, the DC randonneurs.
Thanks for the tip. I just found them on line and joined. I see another couple of bloggers I follow (MG and Felkerino) are members of that group. Looking forward to making some connections.
DeleteI appreciate the sentiment of nurturing and helping out new riders. While I have been riding for years and years, a bad car accident curtailed my riding and have trouble with distance, or at least finding a comfortable enough set up to handle distance. It's embarrassing considering what I used to be able to do. Anyway, I love bikes, bike blogs, and fully intended to get into randonneuring last year, but I got sick with something that caused me to lose my balance. It eventually settled down but still too late to start the brevet season this year for the populaires and shorter rides....and then just recently did something to make the hernia my doctor didn't think existed into a real bad one and can barely ride! I do not have a car, live in the country so this is frustrating as I like to be self reliant! So, another season scratched. At least I live in the PNW and can ride year round. The BC Randonneurs are quite active, but not in my area. Hopefully I will be moving to an area where there is an active group and get going next year. Their rules on permanents are that they must be 200km, while RUSA says they can be 100km, right? I'd be happy to do shorter permanents once I'm up and running again. Oh well.
ReplyDeleteI also live in an area where people are afraid to road ride(it's all downhill and mountain biking) and do not have any female riding friends, which would really be nice. It's strange as it is right outside of Vancouver which has a high bike riding population and I have always biked no matter where I lived. I ride with my husband whom is a much stronger rider, and until lovely canadian health care deems me worthy of surgery, I will be sitting at home pouting except for basic 20km rides to town for groceries. I am used to riding alone(other than husband), but would really like the support of some women riders when I am ready to go.
Simply put, I immensely appreciate this blog. I can't relate to your experiences as a competitive cyclist but am passionate about bicycles and bicycling and all that the lifestyle brings to one's life. I especially enjoy that you don't use a pseudonym and are not elusive in any way. You're insightful and humorous and humble. It helps to connect, knowing that you're real, and that's what life is all about. Keep it up Pamela Blayley!!
ReplyDelete